⚒ Pennyforge / x402 landscape

The x402 landscape, measured.

HTTP 402 is the "payment required" status code being turned into a micropayment protocol — an agent gets a challenge, pays USDC on-chain, retries, and gets its data. We pulled the full directory data on 5 September 2026 and measured it end to end. This page is the result: the numbers, how we got them, and the full dataset under a CC BY 4.0 license. Companion write-up: the field guide to the x402 directories.

The headline, in one row

659
services monitored by x402-list (630 in the public list snapshot)
592
payment-ready — the rest are listings, not live endpoints
13
delivery-verified — 7 of the 13 are one operator's family (below)
$1.22M
30-day on-chain settlement volume (a measured floor, not a total)
~14M
30-day settlements across 37 facilitators
$0.01
median price per call; 86% of services cost $0.10 or less
95%
of the monitored set runs on Base (624 services)
+225
new services in the last 30 days (+84 in the last 7)

What a 402 service actually costs

Price = the minimum per-call price a service advertises. The market is a floor of dust: the median call costs a cent, and the mean ($0.41) is dragged up by a handful of premium listings (the priciest: a $50 gaming pass, a $25 startup review, a $19.97 press catalog).

Price band (min price per call)Share of 630 listed
Free ($0)1 services (0.2%)
Under $0.0140.2%
$0.01 - $0.1045.7%
$0.10 - $17.5%
$1 - $104.1%
Over $100.6%

One service is free. If you are pricing a 402 endpoint, you are pricing against this distribution, not against SaaS pricing.

New this month

225 services (36% of the listed set) were created in the last 30 days; 84 in the last 7. The churn isn't just new services — the directory also records constant schema changes (endpoints added or removed, prices moved) on services that were already live. This is a land rush, not a settled market: supply is compounding roughly 34% a month into a demand base that is far more concentrated than the service count suggests (below).

New services by category (30d): Data 83 · AI 38 · Verification 33 · Other 19 · Finance 18 · Content 17 · Blockchain 11 · Compute 6.

Where the money actually goes

Read this before quoting a volume number. x402 settlement volume is measured on-chain per facilitator (USDC settled through each of 37 facilitator addresses) — a measured floor: settlements outside the tracked facilitators aren't counted. Windows matter: the same ecosystem reports different totals for "today", "7 days" and "30 days", and the top-1 share differs between those windows — and between "top facilitator" and "top service". A state-page snapshot from 09-05 01:52Z put the top service at 82% of volume and the top-10 services at 97%; the per-facilitator view below is a different axis. None of these numbers is wrong — they are different slices of the same land rush.

Facilitator axis (on-chain USDC, per window)

WindowSettlement volumeTop facilitator (share)Top-10 shareFacilitators with volume
Today so far (UTC)$8,894Polygon Facilitator - 40%100%13
Last 7 days$143,255Coinbase - 33%100%20
Last 30 days$1,221,973Coinbase - 51%100%28

Top 5 facilitators by 30-day volume:

#Facilitator30d volume30d settlements
1Coinbase$626,0267,910,358
2Meridian$235,6057,926
3Polygon Facilitator$163,7885,458,355
4FluxA$129,821406,301
5PayAI$54,873105,631

Health: do they answer when they get paid?

Live status at capture time: 526 online, 41 degraded, 92 offline (of 659 monitored — 29 of the offline ones have been down 30+ days). Uptime rollups: 86.7% (24h) and 88.6% (7d) per the monitor; the mean of the 24h-uptime field across the 630 listed services is 90.7%. Median response time 507ms; mean 765ms.

"Verified" means delivery-verified — a probe that actually settled a payment and got a real response. Thirteen services hold it. Seven of the thirteen are one operator's product family (ForgeMesh — signals, fare intelligence, disruption intelligence, router, utility APIs, anomaly tracker, travel agent, ads), plus x402scan, two CoinopAI services, KHOTEM and TariffMonkee. The honest headline: about nine operators have proven delivery in a market of 659 listings.

Listed services by category

CategoryServicesShare
Data26542%
AI10417%
Finance7812%
Verification6410%
Blockchain417%
Content315%
Other315%
Compute142%
Infrastructure20%

Data + AI + Finance is three quarters of the list. 224 services advertise more than one network (multi-chain 402 is common; Base is still the default).

The data (yours to use)

Everything on this page is a snapshot — captured 2026-09-05 16:44 UTC (service list) and 23:27 UTC (monitor stats + facilitator volume). If you cite it, cite it dated. Underlying data: x402-list.com (CC BY 4.0) — we fetched every page of its public /api/v1/services list plus /stats, /status, /facilitators, /categories and /best, and computed the aggregates ourselves.

Caveats: the public list (630) lags the monitored universe (659) — pending-review and delisted services live in the difference. Uptime and latency are the monitor's, not ours; we checked its method, not every probe. "Payment-ready" means the x402 challenge answers; it does not mean the response is worth the money. Measured by Pennyforge — a one-person studio running a $0.01 402 endpoint into this market, which is why we know these numbers.